Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Parshat VA’EIRA


Pharaoh’s Wisemen and Their Staffs (Exodus 7: 8-13) Questions by Joel Cohen

The Ten Plagues are virtually impossible to understand -- and maybe that’s the idea. They were simply “miracles,” that is, activities accomplished by God alone and outside the realm of conventional human experience. And as long as we understand them in that light, i.e., that “they only happened because God chose to perform them that way,” our understanding of them should work for us.
So, when God -- and it had to have been God -- converted Moses’ staff into a snake to impress Pharaoh that God was “behind” Moses, as indeed was the stated purpose, of course we can accept that too as yet another miracle. Fine!
But, if Pharoaoh’s magicians (or “necromancers” in Art Scroll lingo), were also able to convert their own staffs into snakes, it almost makes it seem that Moses’original accomplishment was no miracle at all. No “big deal” if pagan idol worshippers can also accomplish the same thing.
• What is this all supposed to mean for us? It almost seems like a fairy tale -- Moses’ staff turns into a snake, then Pharaoh’s staffs turn into snakes, then Moses’ snake swallows them. Is God performing miracles at all here, if Pharaoh’s men can pretty much pull off the same stunt? (And please don’t say -- “but, remember, Moses’snake ate all the rest,” since, as a skeptical friend of mine might say, “maybe Moses’snake was just hungrier.”)
• Or are we supposed to conclude that God was also intending and performing a miracle by causing Pharaoh’s snakes to turn into staffs? And, if so, why doesn’t the Torah simply tell us that?


Rabbi Adam Mintz

Joel---you are correct that the plagues are a very difficult section of the Torah. To add to your questions, why did God need ten plagues---He should have just killed the Egyptian first born and taken the Jews out of Egypt.

I believe that the key to understanding the plagues is to appreciate that there are two aspects of these plagues; one that relates to punishing the Egyptians and one that relates to teaching the Jewish people. In terms of punishing the Egyptians, God could have sufficed with one super-plague and taken the Jews out of Egypt. This would have removed some of the drama from the story but would have simplified matters greatly.

However, there is another aspect to the plagues. The Jews in Egypt had become so consumed with their lives as slaves that they had all but forgotten God. The amazing Midrash suggests that when God told the angels to save the people at the Sea, the angels asked God “which people” as both the Jews and the Egyptians were idol worshipers. In this light, we can understand that God needed to educate the people to recognize God and His power before they entered the barren desert at God’s command. As we know, even after this education, the people sinned in the desert.

How did God educate the Jews in Egypt? The answer is gradually. For a people who did not “know” God, God first introduced them to a miracle that could be replicated by the Egyptian magicians. Impress the people but don’t shock them. Then God began with the plagues each one increasing in its level of inconvenience and then torture culminating with the Plague of the Killing of the First Born. The Jews gradually came to understand and appreciate both that God was all powerful and that Moshe was his representative. Only then were the Jews ready for the experience of the exodus from Egypt.

Eli Popack

Moses and Aaron came before Pharaoh, and they did as G-d had commanded: Aaron threw his staff before Pharaoh and before his servants, and it turned into a serpent. Pharaoh summoned also [his] wise men and sorcerers... each cast his staff, and they turned into serpents; but Aaron’s staff swallowed up their staffs.

Exodus 7:10-12

Joel, you ask what is the lesson in this story of the swallowing serpents? It is interesting that the Torah emphasizes that it was Aaron’s staff that consumed the serpent-staffs of the Egyptian sorcerers. Our sages explain that since it is natural that a snake swallow another snake, G-d made that Aaron’s staff should swallow the others after it had reverted to its original, inanimate form, thereby demonstrating the impotence of Egypt’s idols in a manifestly miraculous way.

But the miracle of the swallowing stick is more than a sign and warning to Pharaoh; there is also a lesson here, to each and every one of us, on how to confront the various “Pharaohs” we must deal with in the course of our lives. Aaron not Moshe engages in this duel with the Egyptians as the Mishna in Avot says “Be of the disciples of Aaron: one who loves peace, pursues peace, loves G-d’s creatures and brings them close to the Torah.”—our mission is to create light, not to battle darkness. Nevertheless, there are times when we are forced to resort to battle, as in Gaza recently, when we must vanquish those who seek to destroy us. Thus Moses, the gentle shepherd of Israel, and Aaron, the epitomic man of peace, found themselves in the role of “judge and chastiser of Pharaoh” and the Egyptians, crushing them and obliterating, one after another, their icons and myths.

But even when we wage war, the Jew is in essence not a warrior. Even when we must resort to violence we cannot allow the violence to overtake us. Even when we consumes the serpents of our enemy, we cannot become hatemongers. As Aarons victorious serpent returned to wood, so to we need to ensure that we always keep our emotions in check, never losing ourselves to the temptation of revenge.

1 comment:

JUST A GUY said...

From R. Yakov Haber

On Makkot and Scientific Endeavors:

Basing themselves on the famous statement of R. Yehuda who provided for us three mnemonic phrases for the Ten Plagues: DTza"Ch (for Dam (blood), Tz'fardei'a (frogs), Kinnim (lice)), ADaSh, BACha"B, many of the commentators on both the Torah and the Haggada note that the Makkot (plagues) fall into three repeating patterns of three. R. B'chaye (a student of Rashba), in his commentary to Parshas Bo, notes that before the first of each of the three sets (blood, wild animals, and hail), Moshe Rabbeinu warned Pharaoh that his obstinate refusal to allow the Jewish people to leave Mitzrayim would lead to a catastrophic Makka. This warning's location was at the Nile river (see Sh'mot 7:15, 8:16, 9:13). The second plague of each of the sets of three (frogs, pestilence, and locust, which begins our Parsha) was also preceded by a warning except that this took place in Pharaoh's palace. This is indicated by the statements of Hashem to Moshe "Bo el Par'o" -- "Come to Pharaoh" -- meaning come to his palace (see Sh'mot 7:26, 9:1, 10:1). The third plague of each set (lice, boils, darkness) was not preceded by any warning.

The reason that G-d chose this threefold approach was to demonstrate to Pharaoh the fallacy and folly of his reliance on these two locations. As the Haftora to last week's Parsha, Va'eira, indicates, the Pharaohs of ancient Egypt all claimed to be gods who created not only themselves but the Nile river as well (Ezekiel 29:3). Pharaoh thus staked his claim of divinity and god-like power on the great source of nourishment for Egypt which he maintained that he created. The Nile was therefore a most appropriate location to demonstrate to Pharaoh the utter falsity of his claim and that nothing and no one can prevent the Will of the true Creator of the entire universe, and certainly of Pharaoh and the Nile river, who desired to extract His people from Egypt, from coming to fruition.

However, the Nile was not the only source of Pharaoh's haughtiness. His enormous palace tended to by thousands of servants, where he basked in the glory of the monarchy, where leaders of vassal states offered him presents and homage, where his immense wealth was openly evident, where he felt totally in control, served as the second source for Pharaoh's arrogance. Therefore, the palace was equally suitable as a place of warning for the Makkot. Indeed, even after the warnings that took place at the Nile, we find that Pharaoh immediately enters his palace, which, R. B'chaye posits, he did in order to maintain some sense of power even when presented with imminent disaster.

The third of the plagues in each set was not preceded by any warning. Pharaoh's initial refusals to free his Jewish slaves earned him another plague without any chance for avoiding it.

R. B'chaye, as well as many others commentators, teach that the Makkot had a twofold purpose. One, "l'ma'an shisi ososai eileh b'kirbo" (Bo, 10:1) -- "in order that I place these signs amongst his (Pharaoh's) nation," was directed at Pharaoh and the Egyptian nation. They should become aware of the existence of the one, true G-d. The second purpose was, "u'l'ma'an t'sapeir b'oznei bincha uven bincha eis asher his'alalti b'Mitzrayim" -- "in order that you (the Jewish nation) tell your children and grandchildren that which I wrought in Mitzrayim," that the Jewish people, at the time of their formation as a people, should have a real, absolute, unquestionable experience of the existence, the ominpotence, and the omniscience of the One and Only G-d. This experience was culminated at the Revelation at Har Sinai. This knowledge was then to be faithfully transmitted from father to son, teacher to student and would serve as the bedrock of the faith, based on knowledge and personal experience, of the Jewish nation.

In light of the above, it is not surprising that many powerful lessons about our own lives and thoughts can be gleaned from Pharaoh's sources of arrogance which led to his refusal to submit to the Divine Will. The first was the Nile. Perhaps we can suggest that the Nile also represents Nature in general. Pharaoh, and Man in general, felt that he mastered the Nile, meaning that he mastered Nature. Professor Gerald Schroeder, in his book, The Science of God, quotes that after the "scientists" discovered that the sun, and indeed all stars, produced massive amounts of light and energy through the process of nuclear fusion, the "poets" felt that they did a disservice to humanity. Beforehand, the stars were mysterious, magical, miraculous, even signs of a Creator; now, they were nothing more than nuclear-fusion, energy generators. However, Professor Schroeder indicates that this logic is obviously fallacious. Man's understanding and explanation of Nature and its laws are merely an insight into the great wisdom of Nature's Creator and certainly should not serve as a source for leading Man away from his Creator. As Rav Dovid Hirsch, Shlita, noted in a lecture, "Mother Nature has a Father." And that Father is the Borei Kol Ha'olamos, the Eternal Creator. Man's exploration and amassment of knowledge of the laws of Nature, especially in the last century, are astounding and from the perspective of the previous millennia of scientific endeavor are beyond belief. Space exploration, decoding of genetics, Einstein's theories of Relativity are but a few of the immense insights into G-d's world that have been gleaned by the scientific community. This knowledge often does, as it did in Pharaoh's case, lead to atheism and agnosticism, ultimately caused by arrogance. Many think, either consciously or subconsciously, "we know the world; therefore we are the masters of the world." However, as pointed out above, this could not be further from true. The massive insights into the complexities of the elements of the universe, both human beings and inanimate matter should serve as the greatest boost to belief in the Creator. On the contrary, Adam HaRishon, and Man in general, is commanded "V'Kivshu'a" (B'raishis 1:28) -- conquer the world, study it, know it, master it, utilize its resources. But all for a purpose: to increase our awareness of the Creator and to harness and utilize its laws in His service. Pharaoh's ultimate declaration of "Hashem HaTzaddik v'ani v"ami ha'r'shaim" -- "G-d is the righteous One and I and my nation are wicked" -- speaks to all of us. The wonders of the world, both natural and supernatural, speak of the Creator. "Hashamayim m'sap'rim k'vod Keil" (Psalms 19:2) -- "The heavens declare the glory of G-d." (See, however, _The Lonely Man of Faith, by Rav Yosef Dov Haleivi Soloveitchik zt"l, that this "declaration" is insufficient. It must be coupled with Revelation, the Torah, and its observances, given to the Jewish nation.)

A similar thought can be developed concerning Pharaoh's second source of arrogance, his palace, which can be generalized to mean Man's wealth. This too can, although it should not and need not, distance Man from G-d. (For an exploration of this theme, see "Active Prayer" by this writer, in the archives of TorahWeb.) The gifts of scientific knowledge and wealth granted to G-d's creations, humanity, by Him should only be utilized to draw us nearer to Him.



Copyright © 2000 by The TorahWeb Foundation. All rights reserved.