Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Parshat Bo

When God Killed Egypt’s Firstborns (Exodus 11-12) Questions By Joel Cohen


The Government of Israel was under tremendous pressure worldwide for killing innocent civilians and children in its responsive attack on Gaza. But even the most strident protagonists against Israel would privately recognize that the Israelis have not set about killing innocents – that these innocents are “collateral” victims caused by Hamas’ own deliberate strategy to place their weaponry in the homes and communities of civilians of innocents, which, in turn, essentially requires Israel to proceed as it has. For Israel, sadly, there may be no other choice, even though the killings of innocents are not its goal.
But on that fateful night in Egypt so many years ago, God actually carried out a deliberate plan to kill innocent baby boys who, by happenstance, were firstborn. For, as He said, “I shall go out in the midst of Egypt. Every firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh who sits on the throne to the firstborn of the maidservant who is behind the millstone . . . .” And, as later reported, He actually did it.
• One can understand God killing Pharaoh himself and his princely son (even though astonishingly God let Pharaoh, who deserved it most, off the hook). One can understand, too, God’s killing many of the rank and file Egyptians who seem to have been Pharaoh’s “Willing Executioners,” to coin Daniel Goldhagen’s memorable phrase; but why kill innocents – total innocents, some babies?
• What kind of lesson is God teaching us with this? After all, isn’t God the Ultimate Role Model?


Rabbi Adam Mintz

Joel---your question is a difficult and troubling one at all times and especially when we are being called upon to defend the actions of the Israeli army in Gaza.

I would like to address your issue through a reflection on the “rules of war” as they have been understood throughout Jewish history. Today, the Israeli Army has a policy in which there are specific guidelines for what type of collateral damage is unavoidable and what needs to be avoided at all costs. This policy has been the topic of discussion and debate in recent years.

In ancient Jewish history, this consideration does not seem to be the rule. Much has been written to try to justify the mitzvah to kill all of Amalek, even the innocent among them. I imagine that we will have the chance to discuss this issue when we reach that section in the Torah. However, how God can command the murder of innocents remains a serious question in spite of all the attempts at justification.

So, now that we recognize that the killing of the first born was not a unique case in Jewish History, we can begin to understand it. First, if we accept the view that the purpose of the plagues was to educate the Jews in their belief in God, maybe God needed to perform the ultimate act of revenge to convince the people of His might. A possible answer---but does that satisfy our sense of justice and morality?

Rather, I would suggest an explanation based on a famous Midrash concerning the hesitancy of King Saul to kill all of the Amalekites. The Midrash tells us that “the one who is compassionate when cruelty is called for, will end up being cruel when compassion is needed.” While we cannot know the reasoning of God, He just may have been teaching that generation and all future generations a lesson that in life, you must respond to situations in an appropriate manner---even if that response is not always the most compassionate one. We will never know why God determined that killing the first born was the appropriate response at that moment but the lesson is one that lives on to this day.


Eli Popack


To add to Rabbi Mintz train of thought, while the loss of life, any life, is a tragedy certainly the loss of innocent lives are a major tragedy, Yet as in all wars including Gaza – there is collateral damage, it is possible that here too the firstborn were the collateral damage of Egypts war against the Jews.
The Midrash Tanchuma explains the verse “Lemakeh Mitzrayim Bivchorayhem - The plague of the Egyptians through their firstborn” to mean, that on the last Shabbat before our ancestors left Egypt they designated lambs for the upcoming Passover Sacrifice. They explained to their Egyptian neighbors that they were instructed by G-d to offer up a sacrifice because the night of their redemption was at hand. On that night, they told their neighbors, all first-born Egyptian males would die.

Upon hearing this, the Egyptian first-born men pleaded with Pharaoh to liberate the Jews, but Pharaoh refused and an armed clash erupted between the first-born Egyptians and the National Guard. Many died in this battle, but Pharaoh's forces ultimately prevailed. This revolt was titled a "great miracle" and it is commemorated every year on the Shabbat before Passover. This was the day that the First born who were the principal taskmasters of the Jews recognized the power and existence of G-d.

Just as in Gaza, the firstborn/civilians were warned of the impending catastrophe and given an opportunity to react, this is the cause of the civil war that erupted. Yet they too were overpowered by the Egyptian National Guard – the Hamas of the day, causing them to be collateral damage.
Nevertheless we must remain cognizant of the fact that loss of life even the lives drowning Egyptian soldiers pursuing the fleeing Jews were something that G-d did not take lightly and hushed the singing angels with the words,” My creatures are drowning, it is not a time to sing.”

3 comments:

JUST A GUY said...

God moves in mysterious ways...read on...(from Aish, by Jeff Jacoby)

Where was God in those days?" asked the pope. Here's a possible answer.


"Where was God in those days?" asked Pope Benedict XVI as he stood in Auschwitz. "Why was he silent? How could he permit this endless slaughter, this triumph of evil?"

It is the inevitable question in Auschwitz, that vast factory of death where the Nazis tortured, starved, shot, and gassed to death as many as a million and a half innocent human beings, most of them Jews. "In a place like this, words fail," Benedict said. "In the end, there can be only a dread silence, a silence which itself is a heartfelt cry to God: Why, Lord, did you remain silent?"

News reports emphasized the pope's question. Every story noted that the man who voiced it was, as he put it, "a son of the German people." No one missed the intense historical significance of a German pope, on a pilgrimage to Poland, beseeching God for answers at the slaughterhouse where just 60 years ago Germans broke every record for shedding Jewish blood.

And yet some commentators accused Benedict of skirting the issue of anti-Semitism. The national director of the Anti-Defamation League said that the pope had "uttered not one word about anti-Semitism; not one explicit acknowledgment of Jewish lives vanquished simply because they were Jews." The National Catholic Register likewise reported that he "did not make any reference to modern anti-Semitism."

In truth, the pope not only acknowledged the reality of Jew-hatred, he explained the pathology that underlies it. Anti-Semites are driven by hostility not just toward Jews, he said, but toward the message of God-based ethics they first brought to the world.

"Deep down, those vicious criminals" -- he was speaking of Hitler and his followers -- "by wiping out this people, wanted to kill the God who called Abraham, who spoke on Sinai and laid down principles to serve as a guide for mankind, principles that are eternally valid. If this people, by its very existence, was a witness to the God who spoke to humanity and took us to himself, then that God finally had to die and power had to belong to man alone -- to those men, who thought that by force they had made themselves masters of the world."


Hitler knew that his will to power could triumph only if he first destroyed Judeo-Christian values.

The Nazis' ultimate goal, Benedict argued, was to rip out Christian morality by its Jewish roots, replacing it with "a faith of their own invention: faith in the rule of man, the rule of the powerful." Hitler knew that his will to power could triumph only if he first destroyed Judeo-Christian values. In the Thousand-Year Reich, God and his moral code would be wiped out. Man, unencumbered by conscience, would reign in his place. It is the oldest of temptations, and Auschwitz is what it leads to.

"Where was God in those days?" asked the pope. How could a just and loving Creator have allowed trainload after trainload of human beings to be murdered at Auschwitz? But why ask such a question only in Auschwitz? Where, after all, was God in the Gulag? Where was God when the Khmer Rouge slaughtered 1.7 million Cambodians? Where was God during the Armenian holocaust? Where was God in Rwanda? Where is God in Darfur?

For that matter, where is God when even one innocent victim is being murdered or raped or abused?

The answer, though the pope didn't say so clearly, is that a world in which God always intervened to prevent cruelty and violence would be a world without freedom -- and life without freedom would be meaningless. God endows human beings with the power to choose between good and evil. Some choose to help their neighbor; others choose to hurt him. There were those in Nazi Europe who herded Jews into gas chambers. And there were those who risked their lives to hide Jews from the Gestapo.

The God "who spoke on Sinai" was not addressing himself to angels or robots who could do no wrong even if they wanted to. He was speaking to real people with real choices to make, and real consequences that flow from those choices. Auschwitz wasn't God's fault. He didn't build the place. And only by changing those who did build it from free moral agents into puppets could he have stopped them from committing their horrific crimes.

It was not God who failed during the Holocaust or in the Gulag, or on 9/11, or in Bosnia. It is not God who fails when human beings do barbaric things to other human beings. Auschwitz is not what happens when the God who says "Thou shalt not murder" and "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself" is silent. It is what happens when men and women refuse to listen.

lubav said...

The killing of the first-born is the last plague in Parsha Bo, Exodus 11:1 - 13:17. There are four types of first-born mentioned in the plague: of all Egypt, Pharaoh, the slave women who grind at the mill and the animals. Shach on the Torah (1550's) writes that these four firstborn correspond to the four kabalistic levels of evil - referred to as klipah, as they are comprised of the four basic elements; earth, water, air and fire. Klipah is literally a shell. The shell of a nut is necessary only while the nut is growing. It must be, however, thrown away in order to eat the nut.



The outer soft skin of the nut is bitter and relates to the element of fire. This part of the shell corresponds to the first born of all Egypt (the last letter of the words firstborn of the land of Egypt spell the Hebrew word "metzar - limit"). The next part of the shell is the hard part that must be cracked. This corresponds to the first born of Egypt and the element of earth. Pharaoh spelled backwards in Hebrew is dirt. The next level is the dry skin that is eaten with the nut. It refers to the slave woman grinding at the mill as the teeth grind the nut and bring out the moisture - the element of water. The final level is the very, very fine skin that is not even noticed. This corresponds to the element of air, which is not seen and the first born of the animals that do not matter.



Once all the klipas were broken, the element of holiness could be redeemed. The exodus of Egypt took a blink of an eye. Since there was no longer any opposition to holiness - there was nothing to hold back the Divine revelation. The exodus of Egypt was the third greatest revelation of G'dliness only to be exceeded by the splitting of the sea and the giving of the Torah. We find ourselves, once again, in our own Egypt. The klipas dominate and the G'dly revelation is obscured. With the coming of Moshiach - those obstructions will be removed and we will witness the greatess revelation of Hashem. May we merit it now.

========================

The following is an exerpt from the previous Lubavitcher Rebbe's Diary. His Yahrtzeit is commemorated this Tuesday.



Motzaei Shabbos Kodesh Parshas Eikev, the evening of 18 Menachem Av. I have been paid very great honor, not merited by many in Eretz Yisroel and in Jerusalem in particular, by all political parties without exception. For this I thank G'd. But in my innermost being, I am broken into pieces.

My first Mincha at the Kosel Maaravi cost me much in terms of health. I kept in mind a vision of myself standing in the Beis HaMikdash. At such a moment, standing at the wall of the Beis HaMikdash, everything becomes different. A person is completely changed. He experiences a certain spiritual elevation, a broken-heart, a sense of self-nullification. It is as if the whole fleshly “I,” the ego, has disappeared. Everything becomes elevated and subsumed in the spiritual, in the realm of the soul, in a layer of rachmanus, an outpouring of the soul in pure prayer and devotion to Above.
That first Mincha afforded me a certain amount of spiritual strength. May HaKadosh Boruch Hu accept all our prayers and requests with everything good.

=========================
The e-Parsha is sponsored



In honor of the bar mitzvah of Gidon Cohen. Proud parents are Dr Gary and Lisa Cohen - Oak Park, Michigan. May he grow to be a ChaYaL - CH"osid, Y"iras shomayim, L"amdan and a source of nachas to his parents and klal Yisroel.



For a complete recovery for Ze'ev Dov ben Lotta, Elana Leah bas Sheindl Rochel and Sora bas Esther.



In Memory of Harav Gavriel Noach ben Nachman Holtzberg HY"D and Rivka bas Shimon Hotzberg HY"D. Nothing short of Moshiach is needed now.



Tune into the JEWISH HOUR - Detroit's only Jewish radio program, with your host, Herschel Finman. Fridays 3:00 - 5:00 PM on WPON 1460 AM - Detroit and www.wpon.com.

The Torah e-Parsha is a project of Congregation Bnai Teshuva. For information on sponsoring the Torah e-Parsha in memory or for the recovery of a loved one, in honor of a simcha or you just feel like being nice, contact via reply. All contributions are tax deductible. Please forward this message to as many friends and associates as you like. © 2009 by Herschel Finman.

Mw said...

First let me apologize for not pasting an entire article as folks did in the previous two comments.

Second, it seems like the responders tackled the second question (what lesson is there) and mostly ignored the first question (how could God do this).

This makes sense, because we can't pretend to speak in God's name, but this killing of children is not so different from the rebellious son, who is killed per Duet. 21: 18-23. This son is no infant to be sure, but he is still a young man who would have had his whole life ahead of him to potentially repent.

My feeling is that God systematically killing off Egyptian first born babies raises the same question as would arise studying infant mortality rates even today for developing countries.

If we put ourselves in God's shoes, we can of course ask why innocent children die every day. But the alternative would be organizing our days like Bill Murray does in "Groundhog Day" to save every choking person and every child scheduled to fall out of a tree. I think it's clear to see why this is not a sustainable idea.

I think God gets off the hook for this one, but the tougher question is to what extent Israel gets to play God in this regard. That remains up for grabs.