Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Parshat Shelach

Question By Joel Cohen

God told Moses: "Send forth men, if you please, and let them spy out the Land." He chose distinguished princes and instructed them to determine whether the inhabitants were strong or weak, few or numerous. They reported back that the Land flowed with milk and honey, but that the cities were fortified, their inhabitants powerful: a Land of Giants.

Caleb and Joshua calmed the people and assured them of victory. The others, though, gave an "evil report," that the Land devours its inhabitants. They complained bitterly that it would have been better to have died in Egypt.

Having reported their "honest" assessment of impending doom, God became angry: All of those above the age of twenty would die in the wilderness. Further, as punishment, because the spy mission took forty days, the nation would wander aimlessly in the wilderness for forty years. The spies themselves would die in a plague.

What mortal sin did the spies commit, if they actually believed that the Land was unconquerable?
Why was the nation punished for simply "listening" to an adverse report by their princes—princes whom Moses himself selected to spy on the Land?
Maybe, the spy episode was actually G‑d seeking to "justify" killing off a slave nation whose past enslavement made them unequipped to "conquer"?

Rabbi Adam Mintz:

Joel, as I reviewed this week's questions, I realized that I basically agree with your conclusion—that G‑d decided to kill the remnant of the slave nation as they were unfit to conquer the land. Yet, there needs to be some development to reach this conclusion.

The Jews are prepared to enter the Land of Israel and G‑d is convinced that they will succeed in created a Jewish homeland. But, then everything begins to unravel. In last week's Parshah, the Jews complain for no reason. We all know that when people start complaining for no reason that bad things are about to happen. Yet, G‑d still trusts the people and commands Moshe to send the princes of each tribe to scout the land. These twelve princes were not spies as is commonly translated—they were scouts whose job was to bring back an accurate assessment of the Land and its inhabitants.

At the beginning of their report, they did exactly as they were commanded. They described the land and the giants that lived there. The cities, they said, were well fortified. All of this would have been fine had the conclusion of the report led the people to believe that in spite of the intimidating circumstances, G‑d would lead the people into the Land. However, instead, they reported that due to what they had seen, the Jews would never be able to conquer the land. And, to compound the problem, the Jews who listened to this report did not reprimand the scouts and reassure one another that G‑d would lead them into the land. Rather, they cried out of a sense of desperation.

It was at this point that G‑d recognized that the people who had experienced the slavery of Egypt did not have the faith and the confidence to enter the Land of Israel. So Joel, I believe that G‑d decided that the generation of slaves could not enter the Land. However, I believe that G‑d came to this decision only after giving this generation every chance to rise to the occasion.

Eli Popack:

You've picked what I believe is one of the most telling stories in the Torah. It is a story that addresses man's mission in this world, the attitude necessary in order to achieve it, and the essence of failure—is it, too, part of the plan? I'll address the questions one-by-one: the spies' sin, the people's mistake, and G‑d's plan throughout this all.

The Spies

The Hebrew word for the verb "to spy" is leragel, and a spy is a meragel. Interestingly, Moses never instructs the spies "leragel," rather he tells them "latur," to "explore." Throughout the episode we read about their "exploring" the Land.

What's the difference? Explorers merely "examine for the purpose of discovery," while spies "observe secretively or furtively with hostile intent" (thank you dictionary.com!). Moses never instructed his delegates to spy; all he wanted was a factual report of what they saw. Whether or not the Land was conquerable was not an issue, they were not asked to supply a report regarding the feasibility of that task. For, after all, G‑d had promised them the Land, and would certainly ensure their victory in battle.

Their sin was this minute deviation from what they were told to do. What started as a mere subjective assessment of how they would militarily conquer the land, ended up in them saying "for they are stronger than He," doubting the ability of the Almighty G‑d Himself.

Lesson One: When human beings, of limited intelligence and perception, receive instructions from the One who knows all, they ought to stick to what they're told to do, and not embellish upon G‑d's command with their own ideas of how to serve Him.

The Nation

Why would a nomadic nation in the middle of a barren desert be so quick to abandon a dream of a homeland? Why would they be so untrusting of the G‑d who splits the sea at whim, brings down a full menu from the sky, and has crushed every army they've encountered until now?

Apparently, it was less about mistrust than it was about being actually quite happy where they were and dreading a change of scenery. And for good reason, both materially and spiritually.

In their estimation, for one to properly receive and assimilate divine wisdom, one must be utterly free of the responsibilities and frustrations of physical life—something only possible in the kind of environment which they enjoyed during their sojourn in the desert.

The daily miracles they experienced provided them with sustenance and protection. But more so, they shielded them from any and all involvement with the material world. For the first generation of our existence as a people, we lived a wholly spiritual life, free of all material concerns; the very food which nourished us was "bread from heaven."

This is why, says Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi, the entire generation was less than excited about entering the land. Becoming a people with a land would require complete immersion in the task of developing and running a successful country. Think of all the work in the kibbutzim in this past century!

The nation's underlying problem with the land was, as the spies expressed it, that "it is a land that consumes its inhabitants"—it consumes one's time and energy with its demands and infringes on one's capacity to study the divine wisdom of Torah and meditate upon its truths. They were unwilling to relinquish their spiritual utopia for the entanglements of an earth-oriented life.

This way of thinking, however, completely misses the point of the creation of the world and man upon it. The raison d'etre of the entire mess we call a "world" is for the human being to discover the Truth and reveal it within every aspect of physical life.

"Make a dwelling for G‑d in the lowly realms!" says the Midrash. You came to this planet to imbue your eating and sleeping, your commerce and government, with a holy and G‑dly purpose.

Lesson Two: The hustle and bustle of material life can not be allowed to disturb you from a spiritual, Torah-based lifestyle. Rather, it's there waiting to be imbued with the Truth, by the Jew who is conscious of his mission in life.

The Plan

Is sin part of the plan too? Does G‑d allow the opportunity for failure so that we can do better in round two?

It's a difficult thing to say, yet the Chassidic masters explanation of how sin is unwanted by G‑d, but part of His arrangement too.

In short, the free choice that G‑d gives us is G‑d's "fearsome plot upon the children of man" (Psalms 66:5). It is He who creates us with the ability to make mistakes, because the might of the rebound that is inspired by the search to come home is even greater than when you never left in the first place. This is obvious in our own story where immediately after Moses stormed angrily at the people for their mistake, they were immediately filled with remorse, were prepared to enter the Promised Land despite all, even at the cost of their very lives.


Lesson 3: Don't despair because of your past mistakes. They serve only as a springboard to bring you to even greater heights. In the words of the Talmud (Sanhedrin 99a): "Where the penitents stand the perfect saints cannot."

2 comments:

JUST A GUY said...

Parshas Shlach
The Gravity Of The Sin Of Not Learning From Mussar

These divrei Torah were adapted from the hashkafa portion of Rabbi Yissocher Frand's Commuter Chavrusah Tapes on the weekly portion: Tape #421, The Issur of Histaklus. Good Shabbos!

Our parsha begins with the discussion of the Spies -- while last week's parsha concluded with the punishment Miriam received for speaking lashon horah [gossip] about her brother, Moshe. Rashi comments on the juxtaposition of these two sections. Rashi explains that the juxtaposition is a further critique against the wicked spies. They had just witnessed Miriam being punished for inappropriate speech, and they did not learn the appropriate ethical lesson for themselves (hem ra-u, v'lo lakchu mussar).


The Mir Mashgiach, Rav Yeruchem Levovitz, notes that as we read through the narrative of the spies -- as explained by our Sages -- we see they committed many acts of betrayal and rebellion against G-d. Our rabbis interpret their statement "the people of Canaan are stronger 'mimenu'" (normally translated 'than us') as actually saying that the people of Canaan are stronger than Him -- namely, than G-d. In effect they were out and out heretics.


Rav Yeruchem says that in the litany of sins which they committed -- speaking lashon harah about the land of Israel, questioning G-d's omnipotence, and many other acts of theological rebellion climaxing in total heresy -- it is strange that the sages criticize them for "not taking the appropriate ethical lesson".


This is equivalent to a person who steals a car, robs a bank, shoots the guard and takes the customers hostage. He is indicted for robbery, kidnapping, and murder. Would we expect to find appended to such an indictment that he parked in a fire lane?


Rav Yeruchem explains that the crime of failing to learn the appropriate ethical lesson is not such a minor crime. In fact, all the other crimes stem from this one source.


There are events that continuously occur in our lives that are subtle messages being sent to us by the Master of the World. Some of the messages are subtle; some are not so subtle. G-d wants us to hear the message. If we hear that message, we will not go astray.


The incident with Miriam was a watershed event in Jewish history. It should have had a profound impact. It should have made a powerful impression on everyone's life concerning the terrible sin of critical speech. Had the spies looked at this incident carefully and become different people because of it, they would not have committed the sin of delivering a negative report about the land of Israel!


This concept is not limited to the spies. We frequently witness significant events but fail to learn the appropriate message.


Parking in a fire lane does not inevitably lead to the other crimes in the arraignment. It does not follow that the person will then rob and kill and kidnap. However, "hem ra-u v'lo lakchu mussar" -- the fact that people are obtuse to the messages that bombard us throughout our lifetimes does eventually lead do the worst of sins, up to and including out and out heresy.

Levi said...

B”h
Joel,
First of all, as to the spies’ sin, they only proclaimed what they sincerely believed, no big deal, (see all commentators) Come to think of it though, what where they thinking? What where they doing in the desert in the first place, if their whole existence as a nation leaving Egypt was to receive the Torah and return to their homeland, then their assessment and conclusion of the land of Israel was contrary to who and what they were all about, they got it all wrong….
As to the nation who allegedly only did the “listening”, that’s it? Doesn’t it read that they cried all night, protested against Moses and Aaron, questioned G-d’s reasons, wished they’d die right there in the desert, suggested returning to Egypt and threatened to stone Joshua and Caleb?
Whatever the case, there is a point here, see Rashi 14:33, where he notes that the punishment wasn’t merely for this sin alone…

Eli,
What always bothered me about the “Liadi theory” (forgive me) was; if the Jews didn’t want to give up this freebee why were they punished by “wish granted” - staying in the desert an extra 40? Can we assume that ultimately they were being denied what was essentially their benefit, despite their constricted understanding, like a child who’s excused from attending school might assume that he’s being rewarded…